Cheryl Swoopes and D’Shields: The Latest Episode in the Caitlin Clark Controversy

Cheryl Swoopes has long been a towering figure in women’s basketball, but this season, her name has become synonymous with something else: jealousy toward Caitlin Clark. Swoopes’ continuous criticism of Clark has escalated to a point where it seems almost personal, and this week, she found herself in the middle of yet another controversy involving Clark.
The drama unfolded during a recent game when Diamond DeShields, another WNBA player, aggressively fouled Caitlin Clark at half-court while the Indiana Fever were on the move.
This wasn’t just a routine foul; it was a clear act of frustration, a moment that ignited intense reactions from fans and analysts alike. Many accused DeShields of playing dirty, and the backlash was swift. Unfortunately, DeShields also received racist threats in the aftermath, which added another layer of complexity to the situation.
As the criticism poured in, one figure came to DeShields’ defense-Cheryl Swoopes. Swoopes took to Twitter, expressing support for DeShields with the message: “Head up, kid, hate will not win, you are covered, and ain’t nothing these evil people can do about that. All love for you.” This public show of support had serious repercussions for Swoopes.

She was removed from her scheduled analyst role for the Fever vs. Dallas Wings game, a decision that many believe was directly related to her support for DeShields.
Swoopes confirmed her removal in a tweet that read, “Not today, Satan,” after a fan mentioned looking forward to her commentary. While Swoopes may have intended to defend a fellow player, her support of someone involved in an aggressive play against Clark has only added fuel to the fire. Critics argue that by backing players who engage in such behavior, Swoopes is indirectly condoning actions that could lead to serious injuries.
This isn’t the first time Swoopes has been accused of being biased against Clark. Stephen A. Smith, a well-known sports commentator, has also called out Swoopes for her perceived jealousy. Smith, who has been vocal in his support of Clark, didn’t hold back, labeling Swoopes’ comments as “seriously jealous.”

The rivalry between Swoopes and Clark dates back to Clark’s college days. Swoopes has consistently downplayed Clark’s achievements, arguing that Angel Reese, another WNBA player, would have a smoother transition to the pros. Swoopes even questioned the legitimacy of Clark’s NCAA points record, claiming it was due to volume shooting rather than skill. However, Swoopes’ criticisms often miss the mark, especially when she falsely claimed Clark played five years of college basketball and took 40 shots per game—both of which are factually incorrect.
Caitlin Clark’s impact on the WNBA is undeniable. She’s broken multiple records and brought unprecedented attention to the league. However, instead of acknowledging these accomplishments, Swoopes seems intent on diminishing them. Her ongoing criticism of Clark has raised eyebrows and led many to question her motives.
As the WNBA season continues, it remains to be seen how this saga will unfold.
But one thing is clear: Cheryl Swoopes’ stance on Caitlin Clark has not only put her at odds with fans and analysts but also with the broader basketball community. Whether driven by jealousy or a genuine belief in her views, Swoopes’ actions have sparked a conversation that goes beyond the court, touching on issues of fairness, respect, and the treatment of rising stars in the game.