“CHAMPION NOT WORTHY” Danica Patrick angrily lashed out, blaming Lewis shouldn’t became winner of Belgian GP 2024, Russell or Max

Danica Patrick has expressed her frustration with the outcome of the 2024 Belgian Grand Prix, angrily criticizing Lewis Hamilton’s victory and suggesting that either George Russell or Max Verstappen should have been the rightful winner.

In her outspoken remarks, Patrick questioned Hamilton’s legitimacy as the race winner, asserting that the victory should have gone to either Russell or Verstappen. Her comments reflect a deep dissatisfaction with the race result and a belief that the top contenders who were more deserving were overlooked.

Patrick’s criticism highlights the contentious nature of race results and the impact of such outcomes on perceptions of fairness and merit in Formula 1. Her stance adds a layer of drama to the discussion surrounding the race, emphasizing how polarizing and significant these results can be for fans, drivers, and analysts alike.

The implications of Patrick’s remarks extend beyond just the Belgian GP, touching on broader themes of racing integrity and the criteria for determining race outcomes. As the motorsport community processes the fallout from the race, Patrick’s comments may contribute to ongoing debates and scrutiny regarding the decisions and performance of key drivers.

In summary, Danica Patrick’s angry critique of Lewis Hamilton’s win at the Belgian GP 2024, coupled with her belief that George Russell or Max Verstappen were more deserving, underscores the intense emotions and contentious nature of race results in Formula 1.