“FIA ALWAYS TRUE” Danica Patrick defending Max Verstappen shouldn’t get penalty at GP Dutch 2024 DIFFERENT Lewis Hamilton as cheating before

Danica Patrick has come out in defense of Max Verstappen, asserting that the FIA was wrong to penalize him during the Dutch Grand Prix 2024. Patrick, a former racing driver and commentator, has expressed her belief that Verstappen’s penalty was unjust and highlighted that it should not be compared to the penalties faced by Lewis Hamilton in previous races.

Patrick’s defense of Verstappen centers on her view that the FIA’s decision was inconsistent and unfair. She argues that Verstappen’s actions did not warrant the penalty he received, suggesting that the enforcement of racing rules in this instance was flawed. Her remarks come in the context of recent controversies surrounding race regulations and their application.

In contrasting Verstappen’s situation with Hamilton’s past penalties, Patrick emphasizes that Hamilton’s penalties were often seen as a result of clear infractions, whereas Verstappen’s case should be viewed differently. She suggests that the FIA’s handling of Verstappen’s case deviates from the standard set in Hamilton’s instances, implying that the ruling against Verstappen might have been influenced by factors unrelated to the actual incident.

Patrick’s comments have sparked a debate among fans and analysts about the consistency and fairness of race regulations. Her perspective adds a layer of complexity to the ongoing discussions about how penalties are applied in Formula 1 and whether the FIA’s decisions are always in line with the spirit of the sport.

As the conversation continues, Patrick’s defense of Verstappen highlights the broader issues of regulatory consistency and fairness in motorsport, inviting further scrutiny and discussion about how racing rules are enforced and interpreted.